<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.peertechzpublications.org/assets/xsl/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
										<responseDate>2026-04-05T12:53:00Z</responseDate>
										<request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/2455-2283.000048">https://www.peertechzpublications.org/oai-pmh</request><GetRecord><record>
								<header>
									<identifier>oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/2455-2283.000048</identifier>
									<datestamp>2018-03-06</datestamp>
									<setSpec>PTZ.ACG:VOL4</setSpec>
								</header>
								<metadata>
									<oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
										<dc:title>
										Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy to prevent post-operative pancreatic fi stula, a dissonance between evidence and practice
										</dc:title><dc:creator>Noman Shahzad</dc:creator><dc:creator> Tabish Umer Chawla</dc:creator><dc:creator> Saleema Begum</dc:creator><dc:creator>Fareed Ahmed Shaikh</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Leakage of pancreatic enzymes leading to either formation of abdominal collection or pancreatic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fi stula is one the most feared complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Owing to high morbidity&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;and cost related to pancreatic fi stula, multiple interventions including various types of pancreaticoenteric&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;anastomosis have been proposed to prevent this complication. Despite some randomized&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;controlled trials and meta-analyses favoring pancreaticogastrostomy over pancreaticojejunostomy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;clinical practice has not witnessed any change in preference of individual surgeons. One of the underlying&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;facts is that there are various ways of doing pancreatic anastomosis and trials have compared only&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;specifi c techniques while a few novel techniques that have been reported to have very low pancreatic&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;fi stula risk have never been compared in randomized controlled trials comparing pancreaticogastrostomy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;versus pancreaticojejunostomy. Moreover individual surgeons’ comfort and training also matters, and&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;in many instances same results are not reproduced as reported for primary center where technique&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;was developed. So though a good number of randomized controlled trials have been conducted to&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;compare pancreaticogastrostomy with pancreaticojejunostomy, variations in techniques of performing&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;anastomosis limit external validity as well as pooling the data for meta-analysis.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Furthermore subgroup of patients with soft pancreas, who are at high risk of pancreatic leak, should&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;be looked at separately for potential benefi t of type of pancreatic anastomosis.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
										<dc:publisher>Archives of Clinical Gastroenterology - Peertechz Publications</dc:publisher>
										<dc:date>2018-03-06</dc:date>
										<dc:type>Review Article</dc:type>
										<dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-2283.000048</dc:identifier>
										<dc:language>en</dc:language>
										<dc:rights>Copyright © Noman Shahzad et al.</dc:rights>
									</oai_dc:dc>
								</metadata>
							</record></GetRecord>
						</OAI-PMH>
