<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.peertechzpublications.org/assets/xsl/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
										<responseDate>2026-06-02T17:58:45Z</responseDate>
										<request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/2455-4634.000033">https://www.peertechzpublications.org/oai-pmh</request><GetRecord><record>
								<header>
									<identifier>oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/2455-4634.000033</identifier>
									<datestamp>2017-12-14</datestamp>
									<setSpec>PTZ.IJOCS:VOL3</setSpec>
								</header>
								<metadata>
									<oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
										<dc:title>
										Clinical efficacy of novel self-adhesive flowable composite resin restoration: in vivo study
										</dc:title><dc:creator>Ghada A Elbaz</dc:creator><dc:creator> Ola M Fahmy</dc:creator><dc:creator> Mohamed Sherif M</dc:creator><dc:creator> Farag</dc:creator><dc:creator>Yousra S Helmy</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective:&lt;/strong&gt; This study was carried out to evaluate the clinical performance of the conventional flowable composite resin restoration, using one- step adhesive system versus the novel self-adhesive flowable composite restoration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Method:&lt;/strong&gt; Twenty patients received forty class I restorations in primary carious molars using split mouth design. Clinical performance was evaluated using US Public Health Service modified Ryge criteria. Restorations of both materials were evaluated for: anatomic form, marginal integrity, marginal discoloration, surface texture and recurrent caries after 1 week, 3, 6, 9 months and after 12 months.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; Concerning the anatomic form, the marginal integrity and marginal discoloration, there was no statistical difference between both materials till 9 ms but at 12 ms, there was a significant difference in favor of the self-adhering flowable composite. As for the secondary caries till 6 ms, both materials scored 100% score 1, while, at 9 and 12 ms, there was no significant difference between both materials. The surface texture of both restorative materials scored (score1). Tracing both materials by time, there was a statistically significant difference in both materials in the anatomic form, marginal integrity and marginal discoloration.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion:&lt;/strong&gt; self-adhesive flowable composite showed improved clinical performance at 12 months than to conventional flowable composite.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
										<dc:publisher>International Journal of Oral and Craniofacial Science - Peertechz Publications</dc:publisher>
										<dc:date>2017-12-14</dc:date>
										<dc:type>Research Article</dc:type>
										<dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-4634.000033</dc:identifier>
										<dc:language>en</dc:language>
										<dc:rights>Copyright © Ghada A Elbaz et al.</dc:rights>
									</oai_dc:dc>
								</metadata>
							</record></GetRecord>
						</OAI-PMH>
