<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.peertechzpublications.org/assets/xsl/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
										<responseDate>2026-05-29T16:03:44Z</responseDate>
										<request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/2455-5363.000057">https://www.peertechzpublications.org/oai-pmh</request><GetRecord><record>
								<header>
									<identifier>oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/2455-5363.000057</identifier>
									<datestamp>2023-08-29</datestamp>
									<setSpec>PTZ.GJIDCR:VOL9</setSpec>
								</header>
								<metadata>
									<oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
										<dc:title>
										Serial measurements of SIRS criteria to identify unique phenotypes of sepsis: A Microbiologic Approach
										</dc:title><dc:creator>Harman S Gill</dc:creator><dc:creator> Phuong H Nguyen</dc:creator><dc:creator> Jada M English</dc:creator><dc:creator> Kayla A Fay</dc:creator><dc:creator> Elisha Fleig Yin MPAS</dc:creator><dc:creator> Jaskirat Kaur Gill</dc:creator><dc:creator> Todd D Morrell</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Introduction: The utility of serial scoring systems in identifying distinct sepsis phenotypes remains unknown.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Methods: Eligible adults were classified into culture-positive (Cx+) and culture-negative (Cx-) groups alongside pre-defined culture subgroups. Average SIRS &amp;amp; SEP (novel scoring system) scores were calculated at t = 0 and hours 3,6,12 &amp;amp; 24 before and after t = 0. The primary outcome was a difference in SIRS/SEP scores amongst those that were Cx+ or Cx- at any time point. Secondary outcomes were comparing total and component SIRS/SEP scores in microbiologic subgroups over serial time points.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results: 4,701 Cx+ and 3254 Cx- patients met eligibility criteria. Statistically significant differences were seen in the average SIRS score between Cx + and Cx- groups at hours six (Cx+ 1.40+1.04 vs Cx- 1.35+1.01) &amp;amp; 12 (Cx+ 0.95+0.95 vs Cx- 0.90+0.90) after t = 0. The hematologic, urologic, and neurologic subgroups had significant differences at numerous time points before and after T = 0. Similar findings were observed with the SEP scores. Cx+ and Cx- groups (including subgroups) consistently doubled both SIRS/SEP scores before t = 0 with an eventual return to baseline values after T = 0 but at different gradients.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusion: Significant differences in SIRS/SEP scores were seen in Cx+ &amp;amp; Cx- patients at sequential time points. This microbiologic approach in homogenous culture cohorts has the potential to identify distinct phenotypes of sepsis efficiently and practically. Consistent increases in SIRS/SEP scores before t = 0 and sequential decreases after t = 0 may allow for early detection, intervention, and provision for real-time monitoring of therapeutic responses in patients with concerns for sepsis.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
										<dc:publisher>Global Journal of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Research - Peertechz Publications</dc:publisher>
										<dc:date>2023-08-29</dc:date>
										<dc:type>Research Article</dc:type>
										<dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.17352/2455-5363.000057</dc:identifier>
										<dc:language>en</dc:language>
										<dc:rights>Copyright © Harman S Gill et al.</dc:rights>
									</oai_dc:dc>
								</metadata>
							</record></GetRecord>
						</OAI-PMH>
