<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.peertechzpublications.org/assets/xsl/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
										<responseDate>2026-05-14T06:46:29Z</responseDate>
										<request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/acn.000054">https://www.peertechzpublications.org/oai-pmh</request><GetRecord><record>
								<header>
									<identifier>oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/acn.000054</identifier>
									<datestamp>2021-06-14</datestamp>
									<setSpec>PTZ.ACN:VOL7</setSpec>
								</header>
								<metadata>
									<oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
										<dc:title>
										High incidence rate of human herpesvirus 6 infection after Bendamustine, Cytarabine, Etoposide and Melphalan conditioning regimen: A monocentric and retrospective study
										</dc:title><dc:creator>Simon Favre</dc:creator><dc:creator> Mathieu Sauvezie</dc:creator><dc:creator> Stéphane Vigouroux</dc:creator><dc:creator> Reza Tabrizi</dc:creator><dc:creator> Marie-Sarah Dilhuydy</dc:creator><dc:creator> Gaelle Laboure</dc:creator><dc:creator> Margot Robles</dc:creator><dc:creator> Noel Milpied</dc:creator><dc:creator>Kamal Bouabdallah</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;Background: Following shortage of Carmustine, BeEAM regimen (Bendamustine, Etoposide, Cytarabine and Melphalan) was used before autologous transplant in relapsed/refractory lymphoma patients. We evaluated safety and efficacy of BeEAM compared to BEAM.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Patients and methods: Ninety consecutive patients receiving BeEAM (30pts) (Bendamustine 100, 120 or 200 mg/m²/d) or BEAM (60 pts) were retrospectively analyzed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results: In the BEAM group, 68% had NHL and 32% HL compared to 87% and 13% in the BeEAM group (p = 0,014). Pts were in CR or PR at time of transplant. There was no difference regarding hematologic recovery and transfusion requirements. Highest dose of Bendamustine were associated with grade ≥ 2 kidney toxicity. We observed a significant higher incidence of symptomatic HHV-6 infection (53.3% versus 8.3%), digestive toxicity (36.6% versus 15%) and prolonged hospitalization (25 versus 21 days) with BeEAM. After a median follow up of 61 and 49 months for BEAM and BeEAM, 5y-OS and PFS (76% versus 67% and 56% versus 70%) and TRM (0% versus 3%) were not different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Conclusions: BeEAM with the highest doses of Bendamustine was associated with increased risk of HHV-6 infection, longer duration of hospitalization, higher rate of digestive toxicity and increased acute kidney failure while survival was comparable.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
										<dc:publisher>Archives of Clinical Nephrology - Peertechz Publications</dc:publisher>
										<dc:date>2021-06-14</dc:date>
										<dc:type>Research Article</dc:type>
										<dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.17352/acn.000054</dc:identifier>
										<dc:language>en</dc:language>
										<dc:rights>Copyright © Simon Favre et al.</dc:rights>
									</oai_dc:dc>
								</metadata>
							</record></GetRecord>
						</OAI-PMH>
