<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.peertechzpublications.org/assets/xsl/oaitohtml.xsl"?>
<OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
										<responseDate>2026-05-18T05:13:33Z</responseDate>
										<request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/ijrro.000028">https://www.peertechzpublications.org/oai-pmh</request><GetRecord><record>
								<header>
									<identifier>oai:www.peertechzpublications.org:10.17352/ijrro.000028</identifier>
									<datestamp>2018-07-02</datestamp>
									<setSpec>PTZ.IJRRO:VOL4</setSpec>
								</header>
								<metadata>
									<oai_dc:dc xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
										<dc:title>
										Breast conserving surgery and intra-operative specimen radiography: Margin assessment by the surgeon or the radiologist?
										</dc:title><dc:creator>Senthurun Mylvaganam</dc:creator><dc:creator> Habib Tafazal</dc:creator><dc:creator> Virginia Caddick</dc:creator><dc:creator> Priya Madahar</dc:creator><dc:description>&lt;p&gt;In the United Kingdom since the late 1990s there has been both a shortage of and falling level in recruitment of breast radiologists/radiographers. Specimen radiography is a widely used intra-operative adjunct to aid margin assessment in patients undergoing wide local excision for early stage breast cancer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aim: This study looks to determine accuracy and congruence of radiological intra-operative margin assessment by surgeon and consultant radiographer against the gold standard of histological assessment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Methods: Prospective assessment of specimen margins for all wide local excisions performed between June 2015 and June 2017 by a single breast surgeon in the UK. Specimen radiographs were independently assessed by a consultant radiographer and surgeon for adequacy of margins and compared to histological assessment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Results: Both surgeon and consultant radiographer had an equal sensitivity of 33%, and specificity of 63% versus 73%. Negative predictive values were 89.2 (surgeon) vs 90.5 (radiographer). There was fair agreement between surgeon and radiographer (kappa= 0.252).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Discussion: The accuracy of margin assessment by the radiologist in this study is similar to current literature. There is agreement between surgeon and radiographer and a high negative predictive value observed for both in x-ray interpretation suggesting equivalence of assessment and high confidence in evaluating negative margins. With the current UK trend of increasing radiology specific breast disease workload and recruitment deficit, a surgeon margin assessment only of the specimen x-ray may more optimally utilise radiology time without compromising re-operation rates.&lt;/p&gt;</dc:description>
										<dc:publisher>International Journal of Radiology and Radiation Oncology - Peertechz Publications</dc:publisher>
										<dc:date>2018-07-02</dc:date>
										<dc:type>Research Article</dc:type>
										<dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.17352/ijrro.000028</dc:identifier>
										<dc:language>en</dc:language>
										<dc:rights>Copyright © Senthurun Mylvaganam et al.</dc:rights>
									</oai_dc:dc>
								</metadata>
							</record></GetRecord>
						</OAI-PMH>
