Abstract Word Counter | Open Access Publication

Peertechz's Policy on word count

Purpose of word count limit

Peertechz urges the prominent writers or authors to not only concern with what words to use but also how many words. In Peertechz word count is not a rule but a specified guideline on what length of manuscript is acceptable for submission and publication.

Word count is the number of words in a manuscript submitted or to be submitted in the Peertechz's online journals. Writing according to specified word limits is a skill required to set appropriate assessment outcomes. A word limit for manuscripts give a clear indication of the maximum length of a piece of assessed written work, the amount of work expected and therefore how much detail an author should go into and how they should allocate time to one piece of assessed work in relation to the others.

What is included in the word count?

Word count includes everything in the main body of text including heading, tables, citations, quotes, lists etc. However the list of reference, appendices and footnotes are not included in the word count.

Word Economics

The management of the economy of word usage is directly linked with economy of publishing house. It is more economical for us to publish a manuscript of a specific length, than to publish one that is longer. The reason is it costs time and money to proofread and to have an editor who works scrupulously with a manuscript to condense it down to an acceptable word count. All of these costs can be drastically reduced by a writer demonstrating a professional respect for the guidelines outlined below.

Classification	Word Count
Unstructured abstracts for Review Articles	<=250 words
Abstracts for Original Articles	<=250 words
Abstract for short reports	<=250 words
Abstract for Case series	<=250 words
Abstract for Case reports	<=250 words
Abstract for Case in images	<=250 words
Abstract for Clinical images	Not required
Abstract for Letters to editors	Not required

Armando Varela IJICR

The comments from reviewers and editors are always constructive, even if a manuscript is rejected for its publication. I will trust the publication process with Peertechz. - Professor, University of Texas at El Paso, USA
PJCP Juliano Andreoli Miyake

I am happy to be part of the editorial board and I really want to contribute for it! - Professor, Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC, Brazil
Ariela Freya Fundia AMGM

I think that with time, the journal has a great chance of standing out because the broad spectrum of issues included in the aims will allow broad dissemination. - Hematological Genetics Laboratory,Institute of Medicine, Experimental, CONICET- National Academy of Medicine, Argentina
GJE Quan-Xing Liu

Peer-review process in Peertechz is increasing the quality of the journal. Publication time at Peertechz is less than a month which is impressive. - Research Professor, Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, China
Dong ZHANG GJZ

Peer-review process in Peertechz is the best way for publishing high quality papers. Not more than three months. Now the publishing time is one of the most important things for the authors. If we have your trust, we can build on our strengths and overcome our weaknesses. - Associate Professor, School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, China
JNPPR Jinesh A Dugad

The comments received from the reviewers and editors are precise & constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the journal. I suggest that the revised article should be published in immediate edition of journal without delay. I trust Peertechz for my publishing needs.- Temporomandibular Disordes and Orofacial Pain Management, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, USA
Lilian Monica Passarelli PJFST

I think online publishing is faster anyway but maybe it's good to have a paper volume to make it as evidence in the editorial. The peer-review comments were very good and timely. They demonstrated the expertise of the reviewers. The time of publication was excellent, in a month the work was evaluated and published. I published in this journal because I found a very interesting group of publishers in it, all have experience. - Professor and Researcher from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata in Botany and Palynology, Argentina
IJOCS Amit Arvind Agrawal

The comments received from the reviewers and editors were very constructive and were helpful in enhancing the quality of the my article. I have 100% trust in Peertechz. Thank you so much. The publication time at Peertechz was also excellent; after finally submitting the revised version of the article, it took hardly a week for final publication. - Professor, KBH Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir�s Dental College and Hospital, Panchvati, Nasik, INDIA
Teresa Papalia ACN

The reviewer's comments are effective and help to improve the quality of the publication. The timing of the publication are very speedy and this is very encouraging for Authors. - Professor, Teresa Papalia, Rosita Greco, Agata Mollica, Renzo Bonofiglio. Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Department. Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
ANPC Mrs Eila-Sisko Korhonen

The peer-review comments and the whole process of publication was very constructive and easy. The publication time was very, very quick. My level of trust in Peertechz is very high. - Senior Lecturer, Eila-Sisko Korhonen, Faculty of Health Care and Nursing, Helsinki, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 4030, 00079 Metropolia, Helsinki, Finland
Poopal Ramakrishnan PJEST

I have noted the accepted and published articles in our PJEST, its interesting and informative. - Research Scholar, Unit of Toxicology , Department of Zoology, School of life sciences ,Bharathiar University, India
IJVSR Zheng-Yong Wen

It's my pleasure to give some advice to the Peertechz publish group. Firstly, I thinks the comments received from the reviewers and editors are constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the journal, authors and the journal should more trust our reviewers and editors, it's essential for reviewers and editors to provide more constructive comments. As to publication time at Peertechz, I think accepted paper should be online no more than two weeks. Finally, as an Editorial Board Member, I absolutely trust in Peertechz. By the way, I hope Peertechz should trust me as well. - Teaching assistant at College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, China
Abu Yousuf PJBRD

Peer-review process in Peertechz Feedback : 4/5 Publication time at Peertechz Feedback : 3/5 Trust in Peertechz Feedback : 5/5. - Senior Lecturer, Energy and Environment, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia
PJMCR Yen-Hui Lin

The manuscript comments from the reviewers and editors is very constructive and helpful. The publication time is appropriate. - Associate Professor, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Tawfik A. Saleh IJNNN

The comments received from the reviewers and editors are constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the article. The publication time taken for an article is reasonable. It is very good service. - Assistant Professor,Chemistry department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia