Pinterest
Guidelines for Authors | Enriching Science in Open Access
×
Peertechz » authorguidelines

Author Guidelines


    For Articles

    Peertechz scientific journals will consider all the latest and outstanding research articles, letters and reviews, Case report, Short report, Editorial, Commentary, Communication, Correspondence, Hypothesis, Methodology, etc. in all aspects of Science, Medicine and Technology. All submissions can be mostly acceptable through online from experts. This online submission process is very compatible with available web browsers which can be used from all OS platforms. If the submission process is interrupted when they submitted their work, they can carry on where they left off. Files can be submitted as an archive file or individual file.

    For Research/Review Article: Title, Name of Authors, Affiliations of that particular author which as corresponding author and Co-authors. Mostly it should be having the order of the fields like Abstract, keywords, Introduction, Background, List of abbreviations, Materials and Methods, Results, conclusion, Acknowledgement and References, Illustrations and figures (if any), Tables and captions, Preparing additional files. Author should provide the clear information for those required fields like figures, tables, and legends or title of that particular figure or table (Figure should be in image format, table should be in table form not in image format).

    For other types of articles:
    1. Title, Author's Name and Affiliation, Co-authors
    2. Introduction, result, conclusion, References
    3. Figures and tables (if any: Figure must be in image format, table must be in table form)s
    Criteria for Online Submissions
    1. Manuscripts must be submitted by corresponding author only (not on their behalf).
    2. Corresponding author is the responsible for submission and peer review process.
    3. Manuscripts must be in US or British English only.
    4. The Editorial office used the plagiarism detection system for the standards of manuscript. Author should accept it.
    5. Editorial office is having right to reject the manuscript at any stage of the processing, Fabrication should not be entertained.
    6. Peertechz welcomes only online submission Click here to submit your manuscript.
    Download manuscript preparation details
    Article Processing Fee

    Peertechz is entirely depends on funds provided by the contributor/research sponsor/universities/institutions. In general, if the institution got a Membership from Peertechz Publication, processing and the cost of the article is covered by the membership but author should be from the same institution, and no further charge is payable. Peertechz Organization will provide the discount or price cut on some of the articles (Based on quality of the manuscript) usually from under developed countries who are not having funding from Institutions/Universities. To apply for a waiver please request during the submission process. A decision on the waiver will normally be made during the article processing.

    Processing Fee

    Download Article Guidelines

    For Abstracts

    Peertechz is a scientific publication which aims to publish all most update and outstanding abstracts in all aspects of Science, Medicine and Technology. All abstracts can be mostly acceptable from scientists/researchers through online. This online submission process is very well-matched with available web browsers which can be used from all OS platforms.

    If an abstract is ready to submit please go through the page Submit an abstract and choose any one of the peer-reviewed journals and follow the steps to submit an abstract.

    Guidelines

    Abstract: The Abstract should not exceed 350 words and must be structured into separate sections: Background, the context and purpose of the study; Results, the main findings; Conclusions, brief summary and potential implications. Please minimize the use of abbreviations and do not cite references in the abstract.

    Download Abstract Guidelines

    For Thesis
    Thesis is defined as below

    1. A statement or theory that is put forward as a premise to be maintained or proved: "can you support your thesis?"
    2. (in Hegelian philosophy) A proposition forming the first stage in the process of dialectical reasoning.

    Peertechz is considering the entire latest and outstanding thesis in all aspects of Science, Medicine and Technology. All submissions can be mostly acceptable through online from graduates and Postgraduates. This online submission process is very compatible with available web browsers which can be used from all OS platforms. When they submitted their work, if the process is interrupted in middle even though they can carry on where they left off. Files can be submitted as an archive file or individual file.

    When a thesis is ready to submit please go to the Submit a thesis page and choose one of the peer-reviewed journals for the thesis. Then follow step by step process to submit the thesis.

    In a thesis by publication, the chapters constitute an introductory and comprehensive gist of the appended published and unpublished article documents. Dissertations normally report on a research project or study, or an extended analysis of a topic. The structure of the thesis or dissertation explains the purpose, the previous research literature which impinges on the topic of the study, the methods used and the findings of the project.

    Guidelines for Thesis

    Introduction: Introduction of the research topic, methodology as well as its scope and significance

    A literature review: Review an article in relevant literature and shows how it could be research issue

    Peertechz welcomes only online submission Click here to submit your manuscript.

    Download Thesis Guidelines

    For Videos

    Peertechz scientific journals will consider the most recent and exceptional video research articles in all aspects of Science, Medicine and Technology. All submissions can be mostly acceptable through online from experts. This online submission process is very well-suited with accessible web browsers which can be used from all OS platforms. If the submission process is interrupted when they submitted their work, they can carry on where they left off. Files can be submitted as an archive file or individual file.

    For Research/Review Article: Title, Name of Authors, Affiliations of that particular author which as corresponding author and Co-authors. Mostly it should have the order of the fields like Abstract, keywords, Introduction, Background, List of abbreviations, Materials and Methods, Results, conclusion, Acknowledgement and References, figures, Tables and captions, videos, preparing additional files. Author should provide the clear information for those required fields like figures, tables, and legends or title of that particular figure or table (Figure should be in image format, table should be in table form not in image format).

    Submission Criteria Criteria for Online Submission
    1. Manuscripts must be submitted to the journal by one of the author from provided authors list in the manuscript, and should not be submitted by anyone on their behalf.
    2. The author who have submitted the article should take the responsibility of that article during submission and overall peer review process. It should be submitted in Standard English (Either US English or British English but not as a mixture) only.
    3. To facilitate rapid publication and to minimize administrative costs, Peertechz access journals accept only online submission Click here to submit your manuscript.
    4. The Editorial office used the plagiarism detection system for checking the standards. By submitting your manuscript to this journal you accept that your manuscript may be screened for plagiarism against previously published works.
    5. The submission may be either suspended or rejected (if not satisfied) at any stage of the processing, if a part of the manuscript or complete manuscript is found to be either plagiarized or redundant without specifying proper reference from where the actual form is copied. Fabrication (lying statement) should not be present.
    6. Peertechz welcomes only online submission Click here to submit your manuscript.

    Download Video Guidelines

Loading




Feedback to Excellence
  • User Avatar
    Armando Varela IJICR

    The comments from reviewers and editors are always constructive, even if a manuscript is rejected for its publication. I will trust the publication process with Peertechz. - Professor, University of Texas at El Paso, USA

  • User Avatar
    PJCP Juliano Andreoli Miyake

    I am happy to be part of the editorial board and I really want to contribute for it! - Professor, Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC, Brazil

  • User Avatar
    Ariela Freya Fundia AMGM

    I think that with time, the journal has a great chance of standing out because the broad spectrum of issues included in the aims will allow broad dissemination. - Hematological Genetics Laboratory,Institute of Medicine, Experimental, CONICET- National Academy of Medicine, Argentina

  • User Avatar
    GJE Quan-Xing Liu

    Peer-review process in Peertechz is increasing the quality of the journal. Publication time at Peertechz is less than a month which is impressive. - Research Professor, Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, China

  • User Avatar
    Dong ZHANG GJZ

    Peer-review process in Peertechz is the best way for publishing high quality papers. Not more than three months. Now the publishing time is one of the most important things for the authors. If we have your trust, we can build on our strengths and overcome our weaknesses. - Associate Professor, School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, China

  • User Avatar
    JNPPR Jinesh A Dugad

    The comments received from the reviewers and editors are precise & constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the journal. I suggest that the revised article should be published in immediate edition of journal without delay. I trust Peertechz for my publishing needs.- Temporomandibular Disordes and Orofacial Pain Management, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, USA

  • User Avatar
    Lilian Monica Passarelli PJFST

    I think online publishing is faster anyway but maybe it's good to have a paper volume to make it as evidence in the editorial. The peer-review comments were very good and timely. They demonstrated the expertise of the reviewers. The time of publication was excellent, in a month the work was evaluated and published. I published in this journal because I found a very interesting group of publishers in it, all have experience. - Professor and Researcher from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata in Botany and Palynology, Argentina

  • User Avatar
    IJOCS Amit Arvind Agrawal

    The comments received from the reviewers and editors were very constructive and were helpful in enhancing the quality of the my article. I have 100% trust in Peertechz. Thank you so much. The publication time at Peertechz was also excellent; after finally submitting the revised version of the article, it took hardly a week for final publication. - Professor, KBH Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir’s Dental College and Hospital, Panchvati, Nasik, INDIA

  • User Avatar
    Teresa Papalia ACN

    The reviewer's comments are effective and help to improve the quality of the publication. The timing of the publication are very speedy and this is very encouraging for Authors. - Professor, Teresa Papalia, Rosita Greco, Agata Mollica, Renzo Bonofiglio. Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Department. Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy

  • User Avatar
    ANPC Mrs Eila-Sisko Korhonen

    The peer-review comments and the whole process of publication was very constructive and easy. The publication time was very, very quick. My level of trust in Peertechz is very high. - Senior Lecturer, Eila-Sisko Korhonen, Faculty of Health Care and Nursing, Helsinki, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 4030, 00079 Metropolia, Helsinki, Finland

  • User Avatar
    Poopal Ramakrishnan PJEST

    I have noted the accepted and published articles in our PJEST, its interesting and informative. - Research Scholar, Unit of Toxicology , Department of Zoology, School of life sciences ,Bharathiar University, India

  • User Avatar
    IJVSR Zheng-Yong Wen

    It's my pleasure to give some advice to the Peertechz publish group. Firstly, I thinks the comments received from the reviewers and editors are constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the journal, authors and the journal should more trust our reviewers and editors, it's essential for reviewers and editors to provide more constructive comments. As to publication time at Peertechz, I think accepted paper should be online no more than two weeks. Finally, as an Editorial Board Member, I absolutely trust in Peertechz. By the way, I hope Peertechz should trust me as well. - Teaching assistant at College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, China

  • User Avatar
    Abu Yousuf PJBRD

    Peer-review process in Peertechz Feedback : 4/5 Publication time at Peertechz Feedback : 3/5 Trust in Peertechz Feedback : 5/5. - Senior Lecturer, Energy and Environment, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia

  • User Avatar
    PJMCR Yen-Hui Lin

    The manuscript comments from the reviewers and editors is very constructive and helpful. The publication time is appropriate. - Associate Professor, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan

  • User Avatar
    Tawfik A. Saleh IJNNN

    The comments received from the reviewers and editors are constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the article. The publication time taken for an article is reasonable. It is very good service. - Assistant Professor,Chemistry department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia

Free counters!