Peer Review Process | Enriching Science in Open Access

Peertechz Peer Review Process

Purpose

Peertechz believes that peer-review process has an important role in authenticating research works in science, health and medicine before final publication. It also helps in analysing whether the submitted manuscript is relevant to the scope of the journal. Peer Review Process assists in maintaining Journal ethical standards and safeguards the truthful honest research works.

Policy

Peertechz adheres double-blind peer review policy for the submitted manuscripts. In double-blind peer review system, the identity of both the author and reviewer is kept hidden. As the reviewers are unaware who wrote the manuscript, they cannot be influenced by their standing within a research community. Moreover, reviewers feel free to comment on the works of experienced and experts of a discipline.

In order to expedite the review process; authors are suggested to send two documents- Title page and manuscript. The title page will contain the details of the corresponding authors and co-authors. However; it is not mandatory to send two documents.

Process

On submission, all papers undergo initial screening by the Editors to ensure suitability for publication. To facilitate this, editor-in-chiefs ensure that the manuscripts are not revealing the identities of the authors to reviewers and vice versa.

Suitable papers are sent to at least two independent referees/reviewers chosen by the Editor, and the reports from the referees are then considered by the Editor, who will make the final decision. The existence and content of an article are kept confidential with Peertechz and the referees involved in review process.

The average time between submission and final publication of the manuscript is 2 to 3 weeks. However, it also depends on workload with reviewers and editors as well as how promptly an author submits the revised manuscript.

Editor-in-Chief/Editor writes to the author(s) of the article explaining his/her decision on publication and enclosing the report from the expert; if applicable. This decision is based on four options:

Acceptance without modifications
Provisional acceptance with modifications (Minor Revision)
Possible acceptance if substantial changes are made (Major Revision)
Rejection

The author of the article has the opportunity to put forward a response to the decision made in the peer-review process. Once the revised manuscript is returned it is checked by the Editor. If further modifications are required, the manuscript is returned to the author(s) to implement the suggestions and re-submit the manuscript. A letter of acceptance is sent to the authors, requesting all authors to give their approval to publish the article and to submit any final material required.

Authors are also requested to pay an article processing charge for their accepted articles to be open access online immediately upon publication at this point. By paying this charge authors are also permitted to post the final, published PDF and full text of their article on website.

Submit your Manuscript

Armando Varela IJICR

The comments from reviewers and editors are always constructive, even if a manuscript is rejected for its publication. I will trust the publication process with Peertechz. - Professor, University of Texas at El Paso, USA
PJCP Juliano Andreoli Miyake

I am happy to be part of the editorial board and I really want to contribute for it! - Professor, Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC, Brazil
Ariela Freya Fundia AMGM

I think that with time, the journal has a great chance of standing out because the broad spectrum of issues included in the aims will allow broad dissemination. - Hematological Genetics Laboratory,Institute of Medicine, Experimental, CONICET- National Academy of Medicine, Argentina
GJE Quan-Xing Liu

Peer-review process in Peertechz is increasing the quality of the journal. Publication time at Peertechz is less than a month which is impressive. - Research Professor, Institute of Estuarine and Coastal Research, East China Normal University, China
Dong ZHANG GJZ

Peer-review process in Peertechz is the best way for publishing high quality papers. Not more than three months. Now the publishing time is one of the most important things for the authors. If we have your trust, we can build on our strengths and overcome our weaknesses. - Associate Professor, School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, China
JNPPR Jinesh A Dugad

The comments received from the reviewers and editors are precise & constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the journal. I suggest that the revised article should be published in immediate edition of journal without delay. I trust Peertechz for my publishing needs.- Temporomandibular Disordes and Orofacial Pain Management, University of Kentucky College of Dentistry, USA
Lilian Monica Passarelli PJFST

I think online publishing is faster anyway but maybe it's good to have a paper volume to make it as evidence in the editorial. The peer-review comments were very good and timely. They demonstrated the expertise of the reviewers. The time of publication was excellent, in a month the work was evaluated and published. I published in this journal because I found a very interesting group of publishers in it, all have experience. - Professor and Researcher from the Universidad Nacional de La Plata in Botany and Palynology, Argentina
IJOCS Amit Arvind Agrawal

The comments received from the reviewers and editors were very constructive and were helpful in enhancing the quality of the my article. I have 100% trust in Peertechz. Thank you so much. The publication time at Peertechz was also excellent; after finally submitting the revised version of the article, it took hardly a week for final publication. - Professor, KBH Mahatma Gandhi Vidyamandir�s Dental College and Hospital, Panchvati, Nasik, INDIA
Teresa Papalia ACN

The reviewer's comments are effective and help to improve the quality of the publication. The timing of the publication are very speedy and this is very encouraging for Authors. - Professor, Teresa Papalia, Rosita Greco, Agata Mollica, Renzo Bonofiglio. Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation Department. Annunziata Hospital, Cosenza, Italy
ANPC Mrs Eila-Sisko Korhonen

The peer-review comments and the whole process of publication was very constructive and easy. The publication time was very, very quick. My level of trust in Peertechz is very high. - Senior Lecturer, Eila-Sisko Korhonen, Faculty of Health Care and Nursing, Helsinki, Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 4030, 00079 Metropolia, Helsinki, Finland
Poopal Ramakrishnan PJEST

I have noted the accepted and published articles in our PJEST, its interesting and informative. - Research Scholar, Unit of Toxicology , Department of Zoology, School of life sciences ,Bharathiar University, India
IJVSR Zheng-Yong Wen

It's my pleasure to give some advice to the Peertechz publish group. Firstly, I thinks the comments received from the reviewers and editors are constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the journal, authors and the journal should more trust our reviewers and editors, it's essential for reviewers and editors to provide more constructive comments. As to publication time at Peertechz, I think accepted paper should be online no more than two weeks. Finally, as an Editorial Board Member, I absolutely trust in Peertechz. By the way, I hope Peertechz should trust me as well. - Teaching assistant at College of Life Science, Neijiang Normal University, China
Abu Yousuf PJBRD

Peer-review process in Peertechz Feedback : 4/5 Publication time at Peertechz Feedback : 3/5 Trust in Peertechz Feedback : 5/5. - Senior Lecturer, Energy and Environment, Faculty of Engineering Technology, University Malaysia Pahang, Malaysia
PJMCR Yen-Hui Lin

The manuscript comments from the reviewers and editors is very constructive and helpful. The publication time is appropriate. - Associate Professor, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
Tawfik A. Saleh IJNNN

The comments received from the reviewers and editors are constructive and helpful in enhancing the quality of the article. The publication time taken for an article is reasonable. It is very good service. - Assistant Professor,Chemistry department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Saudi Arabia